Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,818.39
(
-0.09%
)
US TECH 100
24,430.40
(
0.09%
)
Dow Jones
47,946.22
(
-0.50%
)
Brent Oil
93.01
(
-1.53%
)
Bitcoin
72,975.68
(
1.65%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 495952
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Gulfbreeze

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 35
Posts 9615
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/29/2000

Gulfbreeze

Member Level

Re: GreyGoose_69 post# 457556

Friday, 11/13/2009 10:52:05 AM

Friday, November 13, 2009 10:52:05 AM

Post# of 495952
Simple yes as all you do is throw some Names around... Bush yes he is to blame. He spent way to much , He did not deal with immigration etc etc... but what about Clinton and his changes to Glass-Steagall? Or what Barney Frank and Chris Dodd did when it comes to Fannie and Freddie? And the economy did not really tank till 2006 when Congress changed hands why is that?
I guess it is just easier (simple) to blame Bush for everything...

In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other. -Voltaire (1764)

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today