News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1062
Posts 44342
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 07/07/2002

Re: augieboo post# 9072

Saturday, 07/27/2002 11:13:55 PM

Saturday, July 27, 2002 11:13:55 PM

Post# of 704041
augie, my point is that executives have to sign the 10Q and 10K as it is now, and by affixing their signature to a document they know has falsehoods are exposing themselves to fraud as it is as well as civil suits. It would be just nice if the SEC would enforce the law as it is, they don't need more laws, IMTO. Breaking that "supposedly" new oath is not better or worse than breaking their committing fraud under their current signature. So what, the additional penalty is perjury?

Zeev


AZH

Where Real Traders Talk Markets

Join thousands of traders sharing insights, catalysts, and charts.

Join Today