News Focus
News Focus
Followers 131
Posts 40046
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/19/2003

Re: Mingy post# 257035

Wednesday, 11/11/2009 11:11:39 AM

Wednesday, November 11, 2009 11:11:39 AM

Post# of 346953
Mingy, IF there were a naked short, and IF RME decided to give all the GFGU shares as a divvy, simple math shows that it would make no difference whatsoever. There are only 5 MM shares for a divvy, which is only one share for every 144.4 in the SPNG OS .... even IF the OS is only 722 MM. The GFGU PPS is .35 this AM. So a divvy would only raise the theoretical value of a SPNG share by .0024. Do you really think any shorts would go into a panic over 2/10ths of a cent per share?

In reality it is even worse. The GFGU shares are restricted and only have "piggyback" rights. In other words, it would be difficult, if not impossible, for a small share holder to ever get their GFGU shares unrestricted. In essence the GFGU shares are worthless to individual retail SPNG share holders. The expense alone would be prohibitive.

Its all a moot point anyway, as there are no NSS shares, air share or counterfeit shares; and RME is NOT going to GIVE anything to anyone. But now you know, that if all your fantasies were credible, a divvy still would not work.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today