News Focus
News Focus
Followers 25
Posts 1377
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2009

Re: WaS post# 119184

Monday, 11/09/2009 1:10:18 AM

Monday, November 09, 2009 1:10:18 AM

Post# of 749756
It sure does, and everybody knows that the FDIC sold the bank for less than reasonable value. The bad part for WMI shareholders is that when more is paid for the bank, the creditors of the bank will be made whole before the holding company even sees a penny as the primary shareholder of the bank.

As far as fraudulently transferring assets that belonged to the holding company and not the bank, WMI doesn't really have a case as far as that goes. Almost all of the value was under the bank.


FYI- If you look at how long that case took to settle along with who ended up paying for the legal fees, one could reasonably argue that it definitely wasn't worth it, and by the way, your response does nothing to dispute the fact that there are valid claims against WMI that will indeed prevent the turnover of "the deposit" money if THJW ever rules on it.

Numbers don't lie, people do.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today