Sunday, November 01, 2009 9:35:23 AM
You still miss the point
Yes it scales. But people are saying it scales exactly like the small demo.
That is probably not correct. However, as I stated before, it may be within a limits of producing more gasoline vs diesel vs ect. Thus, it might come down to a refinery issue not a JBII production issue.
When you start talking about science, since I have my degree, be ready to go over all the details and not just gloss over them. It does matter because certain type of plastics in the small memo might work better than in the large production model. Run 1 kg of plastic 10 times in the demo, and then 10 tons of plastics 10-100 times in the production model. Then you will have results that one can truly compare. Statistical analysis can then be applied.
Otherwise it scale, but does the efficiency of the reaction remain the same? Is so, why is JBII hiring chemists? "THE PROCESS IS HIGHLY OPTIMIZED".
Like I said before, we will know more in time when we have actual data that John wants to release. I can wait (6-12 months) for the data. I think most investors here are for the quick return. I plan to stay with JBII for at least two years. JBII is off to a great start and turning a profit!
As for John designing the process... you might be wrong there. He modified the process to make it more efficient using the catalyst. I thought a Japanese group designed the process or something similar initally. Thus, John did not have the original idea. Put credit were credit is due, another rule in science.
Sorry for being negative, but this board is very different from the others. Some ihubers put so much hype into this stock. It will take time for JBII to grow and I am willing to wait.
Yes it scales. But people are saying it scales exactly like the small demo.
That is probably not correct. However, as I stated before, it may be within a limits of producing more gasoline vs diesel vs ect. Thus, it might come down to a refinery issue not a JBII production issue.
When you start talking about science, since I have my degree, be ready to go over all the details and not just gloss over them. It does matter because certain type of plastics in the small memo might work better than in the large production model. Run 1 kg of plastic 10 times in the demo, and then 10 tons of plastics 10-100 times in the production model. Then you will have results that one can truly compare. Statistical analysis can then be applied.
Otherwise it scale, but does the efficiency of the reaction remain the same? Is so, why is JBII hiring chemists? "THE PROCESS IS HIGHLY OPTIMIZED".
Like I said before, we will know more in time when we have actual data that John wants to release. I can wait (6-12 months) for the data. I think most investors here are for the quick return. I plan to stay with JBII for at least two years. JBII is off to a great start and turning a profit!
As for John designing the process... you might be wrong there. He modified the process to make it more efficient using the catalyst. I thought a Japanese group designed the process or something similar initally. Thus, John did not have the original idea. Put credit were credit is due, another rule in science.
Sorry for being negative, but this board is very different from the others. Some ihubers put so much hype into this stock. It will take time for JBII to grow and I am willing to wait.
