Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,506.48
(
-1.51%
)
US TECH 100
23,484.80
(
-0.99%
)
Dow Jones
45,577.47
(
-0.96%
)
Brent Oil
106.93
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
70,344.04
(
-0.24%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 118239
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

frogdreaming

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 4220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

frogdreaming

Re: johnnyfiber post# 75531

Tuesday, 10/27/2009 7:14:41 PM

Tuesday, October 27, 2009 7:14:41 PM

Post# of 118239
Yeah I get that.

The name RCC Holdings was too close to already existing registered entities.

But the 'already registered entity' with too close a name is the company that already is supposed to own IWS.

What possible reason is there for trying to create a separate company with the exact same name and giving it the IWS asset?

Please tell me that doesn't sound completely innocent to you?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today