I have a novel idea, why don't you actually watch Beck, to find inaccuracies? I've watched Lehrer, and I see core assumptions made that are not factual. I don't watch him much, because I find it boring and I get the same stuff from the other news shows and they are more dramatically biased usually with more overt inaccuracies, so I'm more into watching the target rich shows, so to speak.
CNN is very rich in disinformation. I watched them Friday, sit there and say as if it were fact that Beck had come out against H1N1 vaccinations. That is an absolute inaccuracy.
I watched Beck. He had a doctor on who was pro H1N1 vaccine. and one who had problems with it and wasn't going to give it to his family.
Beck said clearly. He wasn't going to say what his family would do, because it was to important, he wasn't an expert, and he didn't want to sway anyone.
George Bush would have been more justified in cutting out the other networks than Obama is Fox. Fox doesn't put out lies or omit like the Obama 4 do routinely. I should call it 5 because PBS is extremely corrupt and biased.
Hillary Clinton came out and said Fox News gave her the only fair shake she could get in coverage, and it's true. The other Networks decide who they like and they back them. Fox News puts out all the information, while the other 4 pick and choose depending on what helps their guy.
Their guy (Obama) gets mad at Fox, because if Fox wasn't putting out his connection to Rev Wright and how crazy the guy is, no one would know. Same with Aiers, same with Van Jones, Acorn, Lloyd, Lewis, Garret, and other Czars. The same with his shell game on costs of the medical bill. The same with the promises he doesn't keep. This wouldn't be out there, but for Fox NEWS.
Can you even imagine the stuff that would be on those Networks if Bush had issues like Obama's? I mean they made things up and ran as if they were true. They took as source a book from a convicted con man and murderer that Bush did cocaine and ran as it was a good source. (while they ignored Clnton's own brother on FBI tape explaining how they called Clinton Hoover because he sucked up so much cocaine) Took Bush's absence of military documentation over a certain period, made things up that might have happened, and ran it as truth. They even ran with an obvious forgery on that, and when it was pointed out STILL RAN WITH IT!
I mean come on. I don't see how you come to your conclusions on this subject, but there is much left out. And there is much added which is inaccurate. You are taking the word from people who ran forged documents and garbage they pulled out of their asses as journalism because they didn't like Bush. Hello?
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
