News Focus
News Focus
Followers 144
Posts 6229
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/04/2007

Re: marcofluff post# 27957

Tuesday, 10/20/2009 7:13:53 AM

Tuesday, October 20, 2009 7:13:53 AM

Post# of 158876
It all depends on how seriously this company is really being SEEN by its own insiders/owners.

It may be just some sidekick internet thing ya do in place of looking for something to read during dinner (or on a laptop while using the toilet).

If is works and they make a buck then good or if it don’t make a buck then oh well. Not like it's really all that important to them anyways. As it appears.

I agree that if the owners took it more seriously, themselves, it would show in how they maintain it and as of late, it doesn’t appear they're taking their ownership of this company seriously.

So why should we?

Almost a year and no information of operational status.

No company who’s selling shares should ever be without info to its shareholders for this length of time.

At lease say something, “ANYTHING”, I mean, what’s the worst that can happen at these prices? LOL! Going back to NO BID? LOL!

It recently ticked above that. (After almost a year sitting ‘AT ’ that) LOL!

Their functional Website doesn’t signify whether they're operational. Websites are just internet-Bots. They just crank on self-running codes that likely never needs human interventions and the only likely time a HUMAN is involved, is to peek at how much money it deposited into their bank accounts. Beyond that, it's valued about as much as one does an empty can of soup.

Welcome to the PINK SHEETS.

>6^}


Maintaining TRUTHS requires 'little to no effort' than Maintaining LIES.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y