Let's take this one step at a time:
1. No proof of acquisitions
Of course there is no proof of acquisitions at this time. Why would Dean leak the names (or any other verifiable or identifiable evidence) that could potentially jeopardize the closings before they've even been signed? It wouldn't make sense.
2. No proof of bridge loan
The statements that Dean made with respect to the bridge loan do NOT constitute foward-looking statements, and thus are not subjected to the safe harbor provisions of the PSLR Act of 1995. He unequivocally stated in a PR that the company "has" received the loan, and thus would easily be found liable for fraud if that was not true. Personally, I don't Dean would stake this entire enterprise on that one, intentionally false statement. Again, it wouldn't make sense.
3. No proof of anything else
Ok. I'm not sure where you're looking, but I see proof of a buyback (as promised). I also see the updated filings with PinkSheets.com (as promised). I've seen that the Jacksonville Business Journal published a front page article on Atlantic Aviation on Friday, October 2, 2009. I've pictures and read reviews from posters who have actually visited the airport and spoken with Dean.
Seems to me that if you really see no proof of "anything" then you may be intentionally ignoring some evidence that contradicts your point of view.
All IMO.