Cosmic,
I am afraid you have mischaracterized my response again. The truth is, I don't do 'belief' of any kind. Therefore to suggest that I 'believe' that DNAP is a pipedream, is incorrect.
Furthermore, while you have amassed an impressive list of 'possibilites' for drugs or classifiers that may or may not be in a DNAP pipeline. products that may or may not have any connection whatsoever to DNAP, based on a number of fairly tenuous connections and what can only be hopeful assumptions. What you may have failed to consider is that one of the basic attributes of a pipeline is that aside from it's ability to accept input at one end, eventually something has to come out the other. Otherwise it it is not a pipeline, but just a place where questionable concepts go to die.
For the sake of all of the loyal investors here, I hope that you are rewarded with at least a dribble of results from this 'pipeline' in the not too distant future. Some of those concepts have been reported to be imminent for a number of years now.
regards,
frog