MON must be constantly on the guard against customers harvesting seeds from their crops to circumvent the need for repeated purchases…
I’ve thought alot about this pitfall, and as a result I talked myself out of buying MON years ago at a much lower price :- (
The answer the company’s executives furnish whenever someone asks is that the best defense against IP theft is reasonable pricing and continued innovation. As a matter of policy, MON strives to ensure that at least 50% of the incremental economic benefit of any new product accrues to the farmer. In other words, MON fosters a marketplace in which farmers who continually steal “old” IP will end up hurting themselves as much as hurting MON.
Legal ramifications from a general public fear of unanticipated consequences regarding gene modifications.
I’m not unduly concerned about this. Europe is the last major hotbed for this kind of paranoia; in most of the rest of the world, this battle has been won. Regards, Dew
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”