News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257656
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 123036
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: genisi post# 83364

Thursday, 09/10/2009 10:54:22 PM

Thursday, September 10, 2009 10:54:22 PM

Post# of 257656
AGN re: Incremental Botox sales for migraine

Patients enrolled in the two phase III studies were the worst cases… and they got 150-200 units of Botox per patient. I don't know why [Corey Davis] wrote 200 units or more.

In a non-clinical-trial setting, 150-200 units is effectively 200 units because Botox comes in 100-unit vials. Where Davis went wrong is in implying that 200 units is 8x as much Botox as what a 25-unit cosmetic procedure requires. As I noted in #msg-41294358, you can’t calculate Botox usage that way (unless you are talking about the practice of a high-volume injector who sees manifold cosmetic patients closely spaced in time).

Because of wastage from the unused portion of a vial, I would estimate that the average cosmetic patient effectively uses about 70 units of Botox rather than the 25 units that Davis figured. Thus, a headache patient who needs two vials will use about 3x as much Botox as an average cosmetic patient—not 8x as much, as Davis surmised. This, combined with the existing off-label use of Botox for headache, means that Davis’ numbers for the incremental sales from a headache approval are substantially too high, IMO.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today