Here’s an interesting question, everyone expected Iraq to heat up as elections grow closer. But have the terrorist attacks in Russia and the proposed missile deployments in Russia’s near abroad, etc. which surely have got both Russia and China’s attention, contributed in any way to the increase in violence in Iraq and Afghanistan? Because if I were Russia, China, Iran or Syria I would consider Iraq an opportunity in which to keep Bush busy and thus attempt to thwart not only his missile deployment plans but anything associated with his bid for world domination including the mess building in Southeast Asia.
I simply have not had much time to keep up with the many unfolding and escalating events of the last few weeks. However one of the fact patterns I was working suggested to me that the unity of many countries with Moscow before and during the start of IraqNam had faded somewhat and they were jockeying for position with each other. If there is any truth to this it would suggest to me that they consider Iraq to be a weight we simply cannot hold much longer without some dramatic escalation in the number of troops which will not happen until after the election. We are in the top of the first inning and everyone has their eyes on the next inning. It is gonna be a long and grinding ball game once things really get going.
I wonder if Moscow would see it to their gain if the Patriot act was enforced more after the next election and we took another goose step away from freedom?