News Focus
News Focus
Followers 9
Posts 2441
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/25/2001

Re: Rdiddy post# 4786

Sunday, 08/23/2009 2:18:37 AM

Sunday, August 23, 2009 2:18:37 AM

Post# of 5660
Diddly, You profess being a CPA, fine. Let's start with a sheet of paper.

In Mining 1st one must have a mineral resource. That would be a potential number for you types to start with. Which has been proven to be less than recoverable at a profit. So your sheet of paper has a ZERO from the get go.

Next, what is the mineral occurrence on this or adjacent claims. Virtually none.

Mineral resources: Claimed by your ilk.
Potential: MAYBE= $1.6 to a Zillion.
Possible : VIRTUALLY NONE= $5 Million
Proven : NONE= ZERO
Should NMCX EVER provide documentation to the contrary, we then enter the world of ORE DEPOSIT.
Which requires the following;
Must be economically & technically feasible to extract.

You choose to use the Heter report or the jerks from Florida, fine, I choose to use the (Local) Act-Lab and Bondar-Clegg assays.

BTW: nmcx can and does say what it wishes, while not being scrutinized by the SEC, so did nmcx LIE! Look in your "401".









to catch a fish is not all of fishing. Zane Grey Tales of Swordfish and Tuna 1926

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today