When you can provide documentation and/or link(s) to support your claim(s) or rather opinion(s), your argument(s) may actually have some weight. Until that day arrives however, your arguments are unsupported, and just an opinion which may be construed as misguided if not misleading. The basis of my discussion was prompted by what I deemed to be erroneous opinions provided regarding the recent trading of the stock symbol RCCH and I've supported my opinions with factual data.
To the point you are attempting to make with respect to your last misguided post, I will agree with you only to a point, in that at the present, RCCH presently falls into the exception rule by SEC's REG SHO, as found under the Q&A, http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/keyregshoissues.htm and therefore it cannot be determined at the present time, whether the stock symbol RCCH has any outstanding Fails to Deliver, which would ordinarily place a stock on the SEC REG SHO Threshold List.
For a basic understanding of the overall problem, review the first few slides of the following document, and if you are really interested in learning more about the topic then you can review the entire slide show which will take only an hour of your time. Of course, the slideshow does cite a number sources and documents including a few from the SEC and DTCC, which adds credibility.