InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 3031
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/23/2005

Re: walldog0 post# 174034

Thursday, 08/13/2009 9:00:20 AM

Thursday, August 13, 2009 9:00:20 AM

Post# of 361420
The only obsticle I can think of is what happened in BLK1. Cheveron put a tight hole designation on the hole and the JV partners have not been able to put anything out that is truthful. Sinopec could do exactly the same thing and nothing we can do about it. They could say that they hit "at least 150 ft of net pay" but do not know if it is commercially viable. Then the press gets it turned around to say it is not commercially viable as it only found 150 ft of net pay (they leave out the "at LEAST part! Semantics can play a big part here. Lets all hope and pray Sinopec does not repeat Chevrons actions.

Get the straws ready boys! We're fixin to bust Kina wide open! Those elephants are going to think they got hit by the worlds biggest proctologist!


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ERHE News