News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257580
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122988
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: exwannabe post# 82241

Wednesday, 08/12/2009 3:40:52 PM

Wednesday, August 12, 2009 3:40:52 PM

Post# of 257580
MNTA:

The only rational reason [for Amphastar] to fire a preemptive first shot at the FDA [is] to avoid an "MNTA only" approval (since otherwise any bias would work to their benefit). So the important point is that Amphastar was sufficiently concerned about an MNTA-only approval that they would take this step. And what caused them to act now (rather than earlier)?

As previously discussed (#msg-33858393), Amphastar’s prospects to get FDA approval dimmed when the FDA did not act during Amphastar’s 180-day exclusivity period, which ended on 3/31/09. The new action by Amphastar relating to Dr. Woodcock adds to the circumstantial evidence that Amphastar’s ANDA is unlikely to be approved.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today