News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257259
Next 10
Followers 842
Posts 122798
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: exwannabe post# 82241

Wednesday, 08/12/2009 3:40:52 PM

Wednesday, August 12, 2009 3:40:52 PM

Post# of 257259
MNTA:

The only rational reason [for Amphastar] to fire a preemptive first shot at the FDA [is] to avoid an "MNTA only" approval (since otherwise any bias would work to their benefit). So the important point is that Amphastar was sufficiently concerned about an MNTA-only approval that they would take this step. And what caused them to act now (rather than earlier)?

As previously discussed (#msg-33858393), Amphastar’s prospects to get FDA approval dimmed when the FDA did not act during Amphastar’s 180-day exclusivity period, which ended on 3/31/09. The new action by Amphastar relating to Dr. Woodcock adds to the circumstantial evidence that Amphastar’s ANDA is unlikely to be approved.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now