My overall view on election , and who wins or loses, i see the Presidential Debates to be the most significant debates since Nixon and John F.Kennedy in 1960.
History pretty well agrees Kennedy turned a close defeat for himself into a close victory, in 1960, with the debates.
Kerry was a champion debater at Yale but this not a Yale debate eventhough both are Yalies.
One i feel more and more now realize we can't view Bush as dumbo on the loose.
Bush is a master of evasion and diversion but he does sweat, spout and we see "freak out" simmering in Bush if ever he feels he is cornered.
Kerry must have a plan, he must strategize; he must get Bush cornered, in short he need get Bush to lose it.
But in a manner that is smooth, cunning, and does not give impression he bullied Bush, but merely with correct questioning and like 'Well , i hear what you just said but it avoided my question, so i ask again the question.'
The questions are the key and the method used to box Bush into giving a real answer or to show Bush getting ill-at-ease and obviously avoiding giving an answer.
He really should study tapes and re-run those times when Bush has been hit with a tough question and shows another side of himself, the side republicans don't want people to see.
The part that has led to Bush giving far fewer press conferences than the presidents preceding him.
Bush can be had, it will be up to Kerry, to be smooth on the outside but thinking hostile within, with Bush the target--get Bush off balance and then keep him there, as they say in boxing, against the ropes just praying to be saved by the bell.
Can Kerry do this??? We will find out.
He played his video game night and day.
The MAZE of Death.
But that is the game we all are in, the trick, don't believe it.Get above it all and imagine nothing is what it seems.Kill the machine.otraque
AI
