>>>>>>>>>>As far as Kerry is concerned your coments are taken out of contex<<<<<<<<<<<<
Interesting. I wish you would explain further, that nuance must have missed me. Did he not say that given the current knowledge about that lack of finding WMD, he still would have voted in favor of military action????. That statement seemed pretty clear to me- and a masterstroke by Bush to put him in that box. What was the context, what did he mean to say??
>>>>>> Both of them could have profited handsomely from backing Bush. <<<<<<<<<
Not sure what you mean here. Are you familiar with the UN oil for food scandal whereby sadaam in essence laundered the oil money that was supposed to go towards food and medicine for the Iraquis and used it to bribe officials in mnay european countries. This has been documented and there is a current investigation by Paul Volker, Greespans preceeder as fed chairman. Google oil for food and you'll be astounded and sickened by what you find. France was making huge sums of money selling weapons systems to Iraq as well.
>>>>>>>>>> None were found becasue they had been destroyed by the UN inspectors and not replaced.>>>>>>>>>>>
That is a statement that Ihave never heard. You're saying that the inspectors destroyed all of the tons of chemical and biological weapons that were documented to have existed? What is your source for that knowledge, I have never heard anybody make that assertion
