Nothing But Politics

[otraque]

One, yes it is fact that the vast majority in this deadheat election will make their decision by the party they are registered under.
A good neighbor friend of mine is voting for Bush and he has no strong positive feelings on either candidate so what be the tie breaker, he will vote the party he is registered under, republican.
And yes he does say he will vote democrat at times but only if he has a good feel about the democrat versus the republican.
But he ALWAYS votes.
He scolded me saying i don't care who you vote for just vote it is your duty.
Their are across the country people like this, they vote always, they feel it a duty, and will vote their registered party if they don't have a strong reason to vote for someone in the other party.
i do not know what percentage in U.S. registered Independent i should know, but don't.
This is a revolutionary idea i like it <<There is nothing in the Constitution requiring candidates to be listed on the ballot with their party affiliations, and, if you think about it, the custom of doing so is vaguely undemocratic. It makes elections a monopoly of the major parties, by giving their candidates an enormous advantage--the advantage of an endorsement right there on the ballot--over everyone else who runs. It is easy to imagine a constitutional challenge to the practice of identifying candidates by party, but it is also easy to imagine how wild the effects would be if voters were confronted by a simple list of names with no identifying tags.>. But guess who will crush the idea, the parties:(
It would have to happen at a supreme court level but got the feeling justices would refuse to hear case-- but they should.