First denial, then anger. If Kerry's pro war policies are going to as bad as I suspect a Kerry victory would perhaps have the benefit of exposing the farce of the "two party" system here in America and causing the realization and anger sooner than a Bush victory. War candidate 1 or war candidate 2, this is a choice? The entire political system is pro war and so are the Bush voters and Kerry voters either by desire or denial.
I refuse to vote for an openly pro war candidate. I'm voting Nader. Kerry would have had my vote and my grass roots organizing experience behind him had he taken a real stand against the war.