Nothing But Politics

[otraque]

i see Dreyfus is once again in his "i hate Shi'ites" apoplexy(especially Sistani and Sadr, Dreyfus seems to view that what constitutes 60% of the country should not have power-- he favors working against Sistani and Sadr; again showing liberals become repressors if it does not fit THEIR western Secular is SACRED fanatic view---i state as i have stated before, they, these seculars, have turned secularism into a religion--fanatics are fanatics)
This self-styled raving blogger considers Allawi a better choice than Sistani, who he still thinks is islamic barbarian, Hamod would be disgusted with Dreyfus)
Dreyfus <<Give the ayatollah what he wants? Well, first of all, whatever the problems one might have with Allawi (and I have a few), he at least (1) represents the government of Iraq, puppet-like or not, and (2) is a secular Arab nationalist.>> Another liberal with all the smarts of a Rush Limbaugh, for when they write like this, i see them as intolerant and stupid as Limbaugh.
Ala Lily Tomlin, i remain in search of intelligent life on this planet.
Dreyfus<<And there's more. Sistani is a sick old man. He ain't gonna last. He may indeed command cult-like devotion from the self-mutilating, religious Iraqi Shiites.>. This is low level bigoted hating BS from Dreyfus.
He wrote the above in an attack on Paul Krugman saying he should stick to economics rather than talk about what he doesn't understand.(Krugman is aces compared to this ranting ego-trip Mister Dreyfus)
Sorry Dreyfus you are in thinking Allawi would be a better fate show me you are an bigoted liberal westerner--a small time typist.
Gawd save iraq from the americans both right wing and liberal.

http://www.tompaine.com/archives/the_dreyfuss_report.php