One Step Ahead

[Bo14172]

Tim, thank you for the post.

The post is obviously manufactured, and I contend it was a matter of a person typing misrepresentations and actually typing in Atty Glenn's name WRONGFULLY. This post WAS NOT language from a specific link. I'll prove this in a bit.

First, it comes from the CMKX Board. For some they would say "enough said", and I could end my post now.

This one is too easy to dismiss, and I hope it serves to ease any concern.

First, I say again, there is no link. Prior to this post I typed a dissertation that was very lengthy about NATCO, BREK and the Bank of Bermuda. It went on for pages. Maybe it was a blessing my computer froze and I lost every keystroke of DD and comments that I typed. I was getting bored typing it myself..lol.
I'll give the highlights of it, then focus on one point to show this suspect post for what it is.

First, NATCO has been in business for 101 years as a transfer and registrar agent. A solid reputation with no mention of hint of association with Attorney Glenn: http://www.natco.org/

Next, the Bank of Bermuda. It services the entire island country and beyond. Founded in 1889, the group grew to span 17 of the world's key financial and offshore centres prior to joining the HSBC Group's network in February 2004.

Strongly positioned as a specialist in niche markets, the Bank's clients include high net worth individuals and families with cross-border wealth management needs, alternative investment vehicles, and offshore multi-national corporations. In serving these clients, the Bank focuses on combining technical expertise with a deep understanding of clients' needs to offer the customised financial solutions that set it apart from larger, commodity-type service providers. http://www.bankofbermuda.bm/

Seems like a very reputable commercial bank, and I find no mention of Atty Glenn on their site or news.

Last is BREK Energy. As you can see from the post, it is not from a link, as the first sentence of the post makes no sense! They simply mention 3 companies right in a row, and the names and factoids that aren't clear as to what company they are referring to.

I will prove to you that this suspect post was written with the intent to misrepresent AND the poster simply typed in the name of Atty Glenn. I found the 2 sources from which this suspect post orginates.

Let's look at the factsheet from Hoovers.com. I'll post the link then the language below:

Here is the link: http://www.hoovers.com/brek-energy/--ID__61160--/free-co-factsheet.xhtml

Here is the language:

Brek Energy (formerly First Ecom.com) has made a break with its past singular focus on electronic payment processing, to concentrate its efforts on oil and gas exploration. Making the shift in the middle of 2001, Brek Energy acquired an interest in Gasco Energy, an oil and gas exploration firm with holdings in the Rocky Mountains. The company subsequently acquired a stake in exploration independent Vallenar Energy (with assets in Texas). Prior to the reorganization, the electronic payment processing of e-commerce transactions for banks and merchants via the Internet was the sole revenue reporting segment for Brek Energy.
_______________________________________________________________

Note the almost word for word transposing the bogus post used in the intro. NOWHERE in Hoover's similar write up is Atty Glenn mentioned. The bogus poster simply typed Atty Glenn's name in. He provides no link, because he doesn't have one. He transposed the Hoover's link and WRONGFULLY added Glenn's name.

Further, I found this regarding the issues surrounding BREK Energy. This person used this article for the rest of his post. It is a questionable piece on it own, seeming to serve MM's. However, NO MENTION OF ATTY GLENN is in the piece.

Here is the link: http://www.kycnews.com/KYC/Archives/2002/11_Nov/kycalert_4.htm

I'll save bandwith and not post the language. As you can see no mention of Atty Glenn exists.

I find no link involving Atty Glenn, and I doubt one can be provided. Even if he was working for BREK, it was in a time period when BREK was doing well. BREK's troubles in the article NEVER mention Atty Glenn.

On BREK's website, news is posted as far back as January 31, 2002, and Atty Glenn is not mentioned once. Also, First Tiger is their transfer agent, not NATCO. I see no mention of NATCO. http://www.brekenergy.com/news.htm

Tim, I trust this helps.

Be well, Bo