It depends on what your definition of is...is ! ----- We all remember THAT (in)famous Bill Clinton line. That's what this whole dialogue back-and-forth is starting to sound like. ----- It's like asking... "...did Matt USE iHub for illicit gains...or, did Matt just look the other way and ALLOW iHub to be used for illicit gains..." It really makes little difference. He WAS "complicit" in the use/using of iHub for illicit gains ! I don't think ANY reasonable person can possibly think otherwise ! IMO