I found it both surprising and somewhat insulting to first be adjudicated and then unjustly accused of "..multiple posting.." of what were clearly three different stock market-related issue posts.
The first post, #1, was a proper response on a "...market/SEC-related subject..." to post on a public iHUb board, where the iBox clearly states that "..anybody.." is welcome to participate. The second post, #2, was a simple 'addenda' to the first, since the edit-window had closed on #1 while I dealt with a personal matter.
Neither the first post, nor the addenda, contained anything that an uninvolved person would have had any TOS issue with. My posts #1 and #2 were removed solely because: a) they pointed out relevant issues associated with the stock market-related subject that the writer of the original post/subject can't personally deal with; i.e.: constructive review. or b) out of hand, by someone who never even read them.
Apparently looking only at the opening, "...Dearest Joseph...", an incorrect assumption was drawn, immediate punitive action was taken, and when shown to be totally baseless - not even an "...oh, I see.." was offered after the several-hour hiatus. An appology is obviously out of the question. I guess we're just supposed to accept small coins thrown from the coach, and shuffle off on our serfly way like the hunchback on Monte Python's Flying Circus.