Them two $80,000.00 are no coincidence. Maybe it was paid in cash. Left on the books to look unpaid, if something turned to crap. The SEC screwed that little deal up, if that is how it was paid. Trying to connect the dots from other posts. Odd, 10 days ago there was no objection, or disclaimer about the $80,000.00 not being paid. Matter of fact the only thing explained, he was not paid the $25,000.00, but ''had'' to take it, or something like that. It is in the earlier posts. Indian