News Focus
News Focus
Followers 151
Posts 14953
Boards Moderated 38
Alias Born 09/02/2004

Re: crashman post# 7799

Wednesday, 06/03/2009 12:40:42 AM

Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:40:42 AM

Post# of 16741
Crash:

"a) IMO disclaimers carry no weight in illegal actions."

I never said they did. IMO, IHub has zero liability whether they have disclaimers or not. It's a F-O-R-U-M.

"IHUB has/had the chance to claim innocence by distancing itself from employees accused of wrongdoing. If they continue to let MATT act as he did in the past (keep him as an employee without leave), IMO they will make themselves liable if Matt gets convicted of those crimes."

Exactly. That's why I've been arguing that Matt should be on leave and not allowed to access or post on IHub until it is resovled! And, as has been mentioned, he hasn't posted since the 28th, so I think they got that message.

Len

Rolling Stone: "We're fools, protagonists in a kind of gruesome comedy about the marriage of greed and stupidity ... something that was created by the group of psychopaths on Wall Street whom we allowed to gang-rape the American Dream."

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today