InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,634.58
(
0.03%
)
US TECH 100
18,960.40
(
0.16%
)
Dow Jones
41,606.18
(
-0.04%
)
Brent Oil
72.74
(
-0.80%
)
Bitcoin
60,290.71
(
-0.02%
)
Post# of 16741
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

lentinman

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 152
Posts 14953
Boards Moderated 38
Alias Born 09/02/2004

lentinman

Re: MikeLeaff post# 7781

Wednesday, 06/03/2009 12:04:34 AM

Wednesday, June 03, 2009 12:04:34 AM

Post# of 16741
Mike:

Well, then... we agree on all points.

And, YES... if Matt green-lighted EVO on IHub - and if EVO is guilty of using IHub for illicit gains, then IMO it is a huge leap beyond what the SEC has already accused him (Matt) of.

It's one thing to do bad things on your own. It's another to drag the company into it. To me, that is a major issue because if it can be proven that Matt used IHub or intentionally enabled IHub for illicit gains for himself or anyone else... then IHub stands to be at the mercy of major litigation. Without knowing their level of protection (insurance), it's always possible it could be fatal.

That would be catastrophic IMO.

Len

Rolling Stone: "We're fools, protagonists in a kind of gruesome comedy about the marriage of greed and stupidity ... something that was created by the group of psychopaths on Wall Street whom we allowed to gang-rape the American Dream."

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up