SEC Charges Eleven in Stock Manipulation Ring

[zztops]

I am not trying to say it's OK for people to defraud other people, but it's not up to Ihub and the admin to try to regulate it.
---------------------------------------

Phil, this seems to be your basic premise, and you are incorrect.

One of the most profound duties of any public, or private, company is to protect its customers from wrongdoing by any of its employees. This would include situations where even the suspicion of wrongdoing rises to a level that one could reasonably assume harm might come to customers.

There are probably thousands of cases where companies have been punished by U.S. courts for failing to take proper action, employ proper safeguards, warnings, etc., when business operations were known to have the possibility of infringing on the rights or well-being of its customers.

As a matter of fact, I-Hub has put itself in some jeopardy by allowing Matt to continue in any capacity that might cause harm in any way to anyone (read subscriber) doing business with I-Hub. The evidence against Matt is sufficient to warrant at least a suspension, possibly with pay. I-Hub may wind up regretting its failure to act in a proper and timely fashion in this matter.

What is also hard to understand is I-Hub's failure to remove Matt from the fray for his own good. This young man is in a great deal of trouble at this time. Why any employer would leave him in a position wherein he might very well worsen his situation with one ill-conceived post is difficult to understand.

Someone in authority at I-Hub needs to rethink their position on this situation.