You are comparing apples to celestial mechanics when trying to draw a line between Nuance and ONEV. First the obvious, Nuance is a company with proprietary VR property which is well protected by patents, hundreds of engineers and thousands of consulting techs. ONEV is a toxic death spiral scam with a bunch of general patents which have been walked over more often than the Great Wall of China and a patch program which sends commands interpreted by a genuine Philips or IBM speech engine to an O/S.
Nuance has not "earned a profit" because it has been taking it's millions in rapidly growing revenues and potential shareholder profits and investing them in buying up other small companies to solidify it's position as the 800 pound gorilla in the VR field. Something that has caught the eye of more than one mega giant tech company and it is just a matter of time till they are bought out for $35-40 a share (or more). ONEV has not earned a profit because they spend all their money propping up fake deals and profit sharing schemes on their little patch program so they can issue PRs and run P&Ds so their toxic funders will continue to buy the shareholder's equity in the form of dilutionary, discounted shares. This, so that Dean Weber and his buddies can transfer said shareholder equity to their personal bank accounts and jet set around the world playing "tech manager on permanent, first class international holiday" with your money.
You might want to rethink your definition of "low debt". If Nuance had "low debt" like ONEV has "low debt" they would owe close to the GNP of the United States to somebody, lol. The fact you can even put a genuine, innovative cutting edge VR giant like NUAN together in the same paragraph with a toxic death spiral scam like ONEV and believe there is something to actually compare is proof that your ONEV opinions have gone from a simple pro-ONEV position where you looked for a bright side to every ongoing disaster to abject, wholesale delusion. IMHO.
SBB
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
