News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257272
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122807
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: mcbio post# 78028

Sunday, 05/17/2009 5:39:06 PM

Sunday, May 17, 2009 5:39:06 PM

Post# of 257272

MNTA: to what extent, if any, are you concerned that the FDA might ultimately ask MNTA/NVS to run clinical trials to compare its generic lovenox to the branded version?

This is a low-level concern, IMO. By statute, ANDA’s require a showing of bioequivalence to the branded drug, and NVS/MNTA have already shown that. The FDA has never requested independent confirmation of a generic drug’s safety and efficacy; indeed, such a request would negate the premise of the Hatch-Waxman act that created the ANDA regulatory pathway in the mid 1980’s.

This is not to say that an FDA request for a new clinical study is impossible, but I think it’s sufficiently unlikely to be of little practical consequence. A bigger concern for MNTA investors is that the FDA might approve the competing ANDA’s from Teva and/or Amphastar in addition to the ANDA from NVS/MNTA.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today