News Focus
News Focus
Followers 102
Posts 58880
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 04/07/2007

Re: Brungy post# 44727

Friday, 05/08/2009 10:23:52 AM

Friday, May 08, 2009 10:23:52 AM

Post# of 103308
That's a non answer ( What's in it the the opponents?) and no answer in regard to ( Why didn't the city purchase the site when it originally went up for sale?)

The non answer indicates, IMHO, that some shenanigans may be afoot. The no answer indicates, IMHO, that the city never intended to purchase the site they just want to dictate who can use it.

Pretty shady dealings going on if you ask me when all of this could have been avoided by simply buying the property up front. Now it's a case of well, we don't want it but we don't want you to have it ... Sounds childish doesn't it.


Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today