InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 1054
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/07/2002

Re: retro post# 16437

Thursday, 08/05/2004 11:31:32 AM

Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:31:32 AM

Post# of 82595
It's a bit difficult to tell what most of these are (and in whose favor they are in some cases) without the backing detail. The protective order obviously seeks to restrict one party in an unknown respect. I was more interested in the "motion to withdraw" and the subsequent order denying the motion. I would guess this is not DNAP seeking to withdraw. The other intriguing one was the "order appointing Special Master". I'm not sure if this relates to a martial arts related punishment for Dr K, is a reference to some masonic practice that the Florida Circuit Court engages in, or is something else entirely. Time will tell...