Foreign Correspondence

[CoalTrain]

The Clinton's Actually LOST the war in Kosovo.

Belgrade was willing to let NATO take over Kosovo itself but Madeline "Mad Bomber" Albright would not settle for that. The counterproposal that she sent back included giving NATO among many other things the right to priority use of the train system for free anywhere in Serbia. In other words a complete surrender of Serbia NOT just Kosovo.

We were sold the war with the promise that only a few days later it would all be over. We would only make surgical strikes on military targets. Of course using smart bombs only. 78 days later and the loss of a Stealth bomber, bombing of maternity wards and schools and other civilian targets the Clintonista's signed THE EXACT SAME AGREEMENT THE SERBS WERE WILLING TO SIGN FROM THE START!! The agreement was exactly the same. Down to every comma, period and crossing of the I's and dotting of the T's. Milosovich made a point of that.

We got not one inch more than we would have without the war.
THIS is what the Clinton's war machine calls winning?!

This was only on the military front. On the diplomatic front it was a failure second only to Iraq in recent times.

The Clintonista's:

Killed a growing Democracy movement in Serbia.

Bombed Maternity wards.

Bombed schools.

Bombed civilian trains.

Bombed Romania. Supposedly only a few stray smart bombs. Opps!

Bombed the hell out of industrial plants on the river between Romania and Serbia which not only sent large amounts of toxic waste downstream into other countries it had a very bad effect on the Romanian economy.

The same group of thugs in Belgrade that Moscow helped down the "stealth" bomber still are in power. Milosovich is locked up in the kangaroo court at the Hauge and his wife fled to Moscow ( of all places ) but the same gang rules in Belgrade.

The Democrats are going to call this a success?

Kerry is saying he will have a "better" war on terror than Bush and no mention of an exit strategy. Even worse no one high profile has been raising the issue of an exit strategy. Given this situation I have been asking what are the people who have opposed the war for so long but support Kerry thinking? Are they smoking crack?

If Kerry's spin doctors can start claiming the Balkans intervention and the War in Kosovo a success and not be laughed off stage I will change my position. I won't be asking what are the people who "think" they oppose the war smoking. I will be asking why do crack heads think more clearly and have better powers of observation than the Kerry supporters.

BTW in Kerrys recent speech he said the 40,000 troops were not going to Iraq. Well that makes a lot of sense. Why train and get 40,000 troops ready for war and not use them? Especially when the troops in Iraq are over taxed? Does Kerry have plans to send these troops elsewhere than Iraq for the war on terror?

Myself I am voting for an exit strategy. How foolish. I mean what good is an exit strategy? We should always go to war with no exit strategy. I mean , if we had an exit strategy we might be forced to have an entry strategy. How foolish.