MNTA – Thanks, drbio, for the Leerink Swann report.
Joseph Schwartz (analyst): Teva likely submitted the CP seeking to stall M-356 [generic Copaxone] in its regulatory pathway…
“Likely” strikes me as unduly timid on the analyst’s part; is there another reason why Teva would have submitted the Copaxone CP? (Rhetorical question—no need to reply.)
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”