NO QUARTER FOR CORRUPTION (Focussing on The Fed./FRBS)

[Vexari]

The Federal Reserve is a private, int'l banking cartel.

http://www.newfrontiercoalition.com/Communist_Federal_Reserve.pdf

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:42:17 -0800
From: [e-mail]
Subject: The Federal Reserve is a private, int'l banking cartel.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Federal Reserve is no more FEDERAL than the Federal Express. It is a
private banking cartel.

***********************************************
Subscribe to the free e-letter [e-mail]

Lawful information is not legal advice . Use all lawful and legal
means to peacefully restore the sovereign's place in a
Constitutional Republic. Threats and coercion are not advocated or
supported against anyone.


-------Original Message-------

From: Beaver Cole
Date: 11/30/05 07:04:42
To: Beaver Cole
Subject: Revised - Communist Links to the Federal Reserve



COMMUNIST Links to the Federal Reserve
Beaver Cole - Kilgore, Texas

The paper money in your wallet contains these words: "FederaNote.
This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private."
Why does paper money not state that it is a note from the Treasury
of the United States? The Federal Reserve is not the Treasury, it
is a privately owned central bank. To put it in every day terms, it
is a private corporation, which claims to provide a service to the
people of the United States by furnishing the money which is used in
our banking system.

The monetary system of the United States is in the hands of wealthy
and powerful individuals who control our economy. What this
means is that the power of the Federal Reserve exceeds and
supercedes that of our President and Congress. The Federal Reserve
is not accountable to them. They have never published an annual
report and their meetings are not reported to the press until six
months after they have made a monetary decision.

WHO OWNS the Federal Reserve System? There has always been
speculation about who owns the Federal Reserve System. We don't
mean the managers of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks, nor the
members of the Federal Reserve Board who makes decisions in favor of
the owners, nor those who sit in the Open Market Committee, which
operates only through the New York Branch of the Federal Reserve.
We mean the real owners of the Federal Reserve. This has been one
of the best-kept secrets of all time, because the Federal Reserve
Act of 1913 provided that the names of the owner banks must remain
secret. However, R. E. McMaster, publisher of the newsletter The
Reaper, asked his Swiss and Saudi Arabian contacts which banks hold
controlling stock in the Federal Reserve System. The answer:

a.. Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin
b.. Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris
c.. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
d.. Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam
e.. Lehman Brothers Bank of New York
f.. Kuhn, Loeb Bank of New York
g.. Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
h.. Goldman, Sachs Bank of New York

The Federal Reserve has NEVER been audited, nor has the FedeReserve
NEVER paid a single penny in taxes other than property tax.
TRILLIONS upon TRILLIONS of TAX FREE DOLLARS have been laundered off
the backs of the simple minded people under the income tax scheme
for payment of the erroneous and fictitious National Debt owed to
the Federal Reserve.

Why did Congress surrender it's obligation set forth by the
Constitution to regulate and maintain our national monetary system?
Does the Constitution allow Congress to delegate their
responsibilities to the Federal Reserve? The Federal Reserve is no
more FEDERAL than the Federal Express. It is a private banking
cartel.

Why are Sovereign citizens of the states so willing to surrefreedoms
and liberties caused by unconstitutional acts such as
Executive Orders, Income Tax, Sales Tax, War Powers, NAFTA, GATT,
and a host of other communist goals? Are we brain dead? Have our
brain cells quit talking to each other?

Abreviated references such as the FED, GATT, NAFTA, and WTO become
familiar to most Americans. The news media provide reports
about free trade when there is a debate among politicians, but the
details presented are usually scant. The public has not been given
the complete and proper picture when it comes to these international
agreements.

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times,magazine,
and other great publications whose directors have attended
our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost
forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our
plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of
publicity during those years. But the world is now more
sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The
supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers
is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in
past centuries." - David Rockefeller, at a 1991 Bilderberger
meeting.

On November 20, 1993, the Senate voted on an act of Congressthe North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The Senate
approved it by a vote of sixty-one to thirty-eight, but a perplexing
question lingers to this day. Since NAFTA was passed by less than
two thirds of the Senate, how could it possibly be valid under the
Constitution? Because it is an act of Congress and not a treaty. A
treaty would have to abide by the constitutional guidelines. After
a long and heated discussion of pertinent issues, why was there no
mention of this constitutional (in reality, non-constitutional
concern? Considering the fact that thirty-eight senators voted
against NAFTA, and numerous high profile leaders sought the demise
of it, it would seem as if and all arguments would have been used in
an attempt to defeat the measure.

Make no mistake that GATT, NAFTA, WTO, FEDS (Federal Reservealleged
ratification of the 16th Amendment (imposing income tax),
all form a conspiracy for ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT being implemented by
the intellectual elite and world bankers.

The trend towards world government involves the quite networthousands
of individuals. If there is a conspiracy to establish a
one world government, it has become an open one. Consider the title
of H. G. Wells' book, The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World
Revolution. The coporate elite reveal much about their plans,
because they look at the people with contempt, having had had their
way for many years. President Nixon told The New York Times on
November 10, 1972: "The average American is just like the child in
the family." Averell Harriman said the American people wanted
nothing better than to "go to the movies and drink Coke." In 1996,
Ted Truner, head of CNN, said before an international forum: "The
U.S. has got some of the dumbest people in the world. I want you
to know that."

People attack the view that there is a conspiracy involving wealthy
and powerful to achieve world government. This is done
because globalist advocates are unable to refute these claims. When
the message can not be refuted, the messenger is attacked. Thomas
Jefferson warned: "Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the
accidental opinion of a day. But a series of oppressions, begun at
a distinguished period, and pursued unalaterably through every
change of ministers, too plainly proves a deliberate systematic plan
of reducing us to slavery."

"Nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states willa single,
global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a
great idea after all." - Strobe Talbott, former Deputy Secretary of
State and Bill Clinton's Oxford roommate, in Time magazine, July
1992.

"It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nationsto which
the American people will henceforth pledge their
allegiance. - President George Bush, addressing the U.N. General
Assembly, February 1, 1992.

=============================================
No law compels a work eligible man or woman to submit a form W-4 or W-9(or their equivalent) nor disclose an SSN as a condition of being hired or keeping one's job. With the exception of an order from a court of competent jurisdiction issued by a duly qualified judge, no amounts can be lawfully taken from one's pay (for taxes, fees or other charges) without the worker's explicit, knowing, voluntary, written consent. http://www.preferredservices.org/NonconsentualTaking.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Archived files: http://archive.mail-list.com/paycheck-piracy