News Focus
News Focus
Followers 18
Posts 26514
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: lee kramer post# 613139

Wednesday, 02/18/2009 10:18:02 AM

Wednesday, February 18, 2009 10:18:02 AM

Post# of 704041
not really me thinks, its just a sucking sound when the money supply contracts hard. A lot of tarp money went to ledger accounts to collateralize obligations and is just sitting there. the money hasnt gone anywhere.

things have to be bought and sold to lose money.

i know there are plenty of real losses. but if you hold 100 billion of MBS's and 30 percent of the houses in them are foreclosed, then I would think that the MBS's would be worth 30 percent less. In a mark to market world, no one is willing to say there are only 30 percent of the houses in that MBS, so they value it at 10 percent and Merrill takes a 90 percent loss on the books, which changes the equity to loan ratios and alters the capital stock of merrill which makes merril put up more money to sit on a ledger account somewhere to collateralize an obligation. And all that money gets sucked out of the money supply and Merrill reports a huge loss. If you accounted for it differently / or had a better system to define and determine what the real risk was per security ( the real problem) then I think the finaces would be different. Meanwhile the MBS obligation has not been sold, no money has been exchanged, no real loss, just paper changes

At least this is what my pea brain thinks. feel free to take a swing at it too

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today