Can you provide a connection?
IWS is ONLY APPROVED Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Technologies
I see EPA approvals, I see other companies installing the systems, I see all the hype and pumping. What I don't see is a real connection between the IWS that developed those systems and the current RCC/IWS.
When I was a project manager in a hitech industry we would always try to depend on technologies that were available from multiple sources, it was much safer. If a company failed and you could not buy services or products from them you would have a secondary source to fall back on.
Unfortunately there were new technologies being developed all the time and it was not always possible to have more than one source for even a critical component or technology. In all such cases where we had to depend on a single source, we wrote into the contract a bulletproof clause that, in the event of the failure of the company, we would have complete access and rights to the technology we were licensing. Meaning if the company failed we could go on using the technology or even setting up our own production line for the product.
My question is; Given that whatever Gene obtained when he picked up IWS for nothing, did it still have exclusive rights to the systems being hyped here?
If IWS failed as a company allowing it to be picked up for nothing, is anyone today, who is using and reselling the systems, obligated in any way to pay licensing fees to RCC/IWS?
And please, when you respond, provide some evidence, not just fluffy PRs.
Thanks in advance.
frog