News Focus
News Focus
Followers 4
Posts 528
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/11/2006

Re: DD-214 post# 3137

Tuesday, 02/10/2009 2:44:41 PM

Tuesday, February 10, 2009 2:44:41 PM

Post# of 5386
Fivestar, let's hope so.

Meanwhile, I have added my voice of concern, as follows:

Dear Mr. DeVecchis:

I am writing as a long term stockholder of Solomon Technology to express my dismay at your recent announcement of a 100/1 Reverse Split with retained 500 million AS. Such a plan can only hurt Solomon Tech by destroying all investor confidence in the Company's solvency. I hope you will reconsider this plan and formulate another option for going forward, one that will not jeopardize the hard won capital that your existing shareholders have invested in Solomon Technology through their belief in the technological potential of your IP portfolio and business strategy.

In discussions with other shareholders it is evident that many believe a RS may be a smart idea, but SOLM must at all cost avoid creating of the impression of massive impending dilution that is created by the present plan. If an RS is approved, it must also reduce the number of Authorized Shares to some more reasonable number through a plan that will communicate to shareholders and the general public a business strategy that does not depend on massive dilution going forward over the next months and years.

I remain positive about the potential of SOLM's technology, but dismayed by the manner in which common shareholders are being hurt through the strategies employed for commercialization.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

XXXXX
Shareholder since 2006

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today