Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,813.11
(
-0.17%
)
US TECH 100
24,424.00
(
0.07%
)
Dow Jones
47,879.68
(
-0.64%
)
Brent Oil
92.69
(
-1.87%
)
Bitcoin
73,148.93
(
1.90%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 118239
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

frogdreaming

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 4220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

frogdreaming

Re: Visibility post# 50674

Wednesday, 01/21/2009 3:25:27 PM

Wednesday, January 21, 2009 3:25:27 PM

Post# of 118239
Please explain that again.

You said the ban started because the company was dumping stocks. I replied that the ban started in 2007, when the o/s proves that they were not dumping stock.

If the ban is put in place to hide the fact that the company is dumping shares, then surely the ban would be instated before the dump started, wouldn't it?

In that case, wouldn't it look exactly as you describe it?



Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today