Simply put so that you can fully realize what I said is not psychobabble (maybe in fact it was responding to psychobabble):
Your message was: "How about $60M+ worth of shareholder equity? The vast majority of which went to support the individuals involved with ONEV."
And then: "Which for all practical purposes is an acronym for "Rahoul & Dean" in this case."
My response is: That is a FALSE conclusion. So, do you realize it is FALSE, or are you trying to cause others to believe it is true? In either case, the evidence is all there and if you bother to unravel it you will find that your statement was FALSE.
So, your attempt to hide using psychobabble as an accusation is also TOTALLY FALSE.