News Focus
News Focus
Followers 13
Posts 761
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/13/2006

Re: MRuWinky post# 82173

Thursday, 12/18/2008 1:51:28 PM

Thursday, December 18, 2008 1:51:28 PM

Post# of 82842
I have to agree with this..

For those who don't remember, I was a moderator for a while here, and took over after the company colapse. I must that I think that there was alot of useful information put down by the past moderation team (of course, since I don't have access now, I can't really quote anything, but I remember seeing just how much was deleted). I know that not all of it was useful, but some of it was (i recall discussions about the massive change in the stock structure for instance, raised quite a few eyebrows, most of which was shot down).

However, I will play devil's advocate. Most of us saw these posts for at least a short time, and many did not believe it anyway (I know I was guilty of sticking up for Plant initially). I really doubt alot would have changed if the posts had been allowed to stay, since we didn't want to listen anyway. We had a company with a multi-million gov contract... who in their right mind would make it up? We had sales being reported by a (then) fully reporting company..what was there to lose? we disregarded most of the people as bashers trying to get some cheap shares, and missed the message we now all have to see...

According to the reporting of a "duped" company: As of 1/22/07, the Company had 200M (Float) & 700M (OS) Shares. However, according to TD, on 3/16, 382M shares were traded; on 3/20, 302M were moved; between 3/15-3/22, 898M total. I wonder who to believe.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today