Albuferon clarification: In #msg-34043876, I said the following:
>> The primary goal of the study was to show that Albuferon dosed biweekly was non-inferior in SVR to Pegasys dosed weekly. Albuferon achieved an SVR of 80% vs 85% for the Pegasys arm; the 5% difference was less than the 12% non-inferiority margin in the SPA and hence the trial is considered a success. <<
I should have made it clear that the 12% non-inferiority margin specified in the SPA was 2-sided—i.e. the 1-sided margin was only 6%.
Thus, the observed outcome in which Albuferon was 5% worse than Pegasys was a squeaker, not an easy success.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”