News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257432
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122881
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: genisi post# 69740

Tuesday, 12/09/2008 4:05:08 PM

Tuesday, December 09, 2008 4:05:08 PM

Post# of 257432
>MRX – I assume this law can be applied retroactively since Mylan has filed a Paragraph IV challenging the Solodyn patent.<

That sounds right—a P-IV challenge wouldn’t make much sense if the patent in question were not covered by the new law.

>But who (if at all) gets exclusivity?<

If MRX ends up settling with all challengers, there will not be any H-W 180-day exclusivity. Instead, MRX will license Solodyn to the settling challengers on terms that mimic the economic rewards of 180-day exclusivity.

If MYL forgoes a settlement and prevails against MRX in court, MYL (rather than Impax) gets the 180-day exclusivity. (Under the pre-2003 H-W rules, Impax would’ve retained the exclusivity despite settling.)


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Where Real Traders Talk Markets

Join thousands of traders sharing insights, catalysts, and charts.

Join Today