There is zero evidence that DNAG was in any way involved in this latest murder case. Zero.
They matched the DNA found at the crime scene with a sample volunteered by the suspect. Such testing is not the purview of DNAG.
While absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, there are certain conclusions that can be drawn from a lack of happenstance.
As we have seen in the past, in the exceedingly rare cases when DNAG is involved, they shout it from the rafters. It would be negligent of management to not take advantage of such a situation, yet there has been not a word. Additionally pay close attention to today's 'volume'. If DNAG was involved there would be a buzz around the police precinct where the crime was solved. The lab workers, the officers involved, their families, their friends etc. would be talking about it. Several of them would take a little spin in the market. A hundred bucks would buy a quarter of a million shares. Who wouldn't take a shot? Buy a few hundred thousand shares, wait for the news to break and collect a nice little profit. But no, only twenty bucks was involved in DNAG transactions today and that was 'selling'. Virtually impossible given the circumstances.
(Consider further. If someone familiar with the company, an existing investor for instance, was convinced that DNAG was involved, wouldn't he or she have taken a little flutter and picked up a few more shares based on that certainty? Of course they would............but they didn't, did they?)
There are several methods of DNA analysis that explain the features of this case without any involvement by DNAG. Chances are virtually nil that DNAG was involved at all.
regards,
frog
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
