InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,576.58
(
0.07%
)
US TECH 100
19,896.40
(
0.01%
)
Dow Jones
39,258.39
(
-0.22%
)
Brent Oil
84.46
(
-1.12%
)
Bitcoin
57,818.39
(
1.96%
)
Post# of 118239
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

bd2004

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 16
Posts 931
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/07/2008

bd2004

Re: bd2004 post# 34635

Monday, 11/24/2008 8:51:17 PM

Monday, November 24, 2008 8:51:17 PM

Post# of 118239
Retorical question for anyone here with a mind for business:

If an uplist were to occur, isn't it more wise for a company to add a reverse stock split alongside of the uplist so as to prevent anyone from selling millions of shares the moment the new share price comes into effect? This causes our shareholder value to remain unchanged until other investors cause the pps to rise or fall.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up