Re: Federal preemption
>Keep in mind that many of the cases brought are about the label - the theory being that the drug company "failed to warn" of the risks. Yet, the drug companies are prohibited from describing risks differently than the label - they can neither warn of greater nor lesser risks.<
There’s a fallacy* in this argument: In most cases, the FDA would gladly agree to adding a warning to a product label that was proposed by the sponsoring company.
--
*There is no footnote, but I thought having an asterisk would make my point sound more professional.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”