The company says it intends to release an income statement and balance sheet by year end.
The whole purpose of having a publicly traded company is to have stocks available for sale as a method for generating $$$ for management to use to grow the company by R&D, advertising/sales, infrastructure growth, etc.
The purchase of stocks by investors is largely determined by percieved risk vs return on investment.
Transparency of the company largely determines investor's percieved risk. So far, PDGT seems to be on the road to improved reporting. Although, it also seems like they are dangling a carrot.
With the amount of information available at this time it seems very difficult to determine a precise cost per share. many guesses could be ventured. Successful litigation of a $5M lawsuit could really boost the price per share. Especially when a 200M reduction in O/S is expected to begin in January.
How about some speculation?
If verifiable contracts/sales revenue since inception could be perceived to be valued at $2M and the lawsuit were to be effective $5M perhaps the company may have retained net earnings of $6M. divide divide the wishful thinking net earnings of $6M by a post buy back O/S of roughly 600M and you're left with a EPS of .01. Then there are multipliers... which I really don't understand atm... I'm imagining multipliers come into existance by percieved business legitmacy and future business profitability.
I just wanted to speculate...
I imagine PennyPicks could give a far more accurate picture of revenues based on all the mountains of DD he's posted in the past.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
