Exactly what I was wondering, and then I remembered something my computer networker son told me about malacious virus or spam e-mails. He said NEVER REPLY to complain or otherwise, as the intent is to clog the network with traffic. In the case of spam, a reply tells the sender they hit the target. Another scenario is Distract the enemy, keep someone too busy putting out fires to get any real work done. While we are contending with the board domination by an anti Calypso commando, new readers may be discouraged from buying the stock, due to lack of positive and relevant information being posted. We can't do much about this until we hear back from conference attendees,other than point people to the white paper on Calypso's website and to past postings of consequence. I'm all for the opposing viewpoint where it is other than cut and paste non-relevant material. Check out Sugarpea's posts for a good example of rational opposition, an open mind ready to be changed should circumstances warrant. His risk tolerance is lower than mine.( I only have 500 shares and have decided to sell some at peaks and buy more at dips, barring unforseen circumstances like bankruptcy). My favorite technical advice has come from BBAAZ and Michael, and for statistical analysis and trading knowledge I look to RLC. I know you didn't ask me, so please take this as effort to welcome you to the board.