News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1177
Posts 134793
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 08/27/2003

Re: Fanny post# 18239

Wednesday, 10/01/2008 3:21:04 AM

Wednesday, October 01, 2008 3:21:04 AM

Post# of 19383
>> My belief is that Uwink will not survive. <<

And my response is that it is possible that you are right, but my belief is that they will survive a few years first at worst because they can always dilute.

>> This is possible but how much can you dilute a pretty worthless business? <<

Enough to last a few years. They are debt-free with a ton of cash as of the last reporting. While they can't dilute forever, I can name countless examples of more non-existent business operations with higher expenses and debt that managed to dilute to survive for many many many years. Hell, UWKI is one of them. They've been diluting to survive for, what, a decade?

>> Let's wait until the next financials are out, then we will see whose perception of the future is nearer the truth. <<

Considering I stated about 150 times tonight alone that I don't have a perception of the future which is why I'm just watching, I'[m not sure what the financials will prove especially since we all know they're going to show another big net loss. Not that it matters - aren't we told by you "never believe the filings" ??

>> Then you can throw those rose-tinted spectacles away! <<

You've got to be kidding. I've said almost nothing "rosey" about UWKI since you created your alias and I'm probably around a sneeze away from being labelled a basher if not already done. Just because I'm correctly your grossly ignorant misinformation which happens to be negative doesn't mean I see any of this money-losing one-trick/hope pony company with rose-tinted anything. hence I'm not a buyer at ANY level at this time.

Raw

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y